Friday, January 24, 2020

The Crucible - Important Character Analysis :: Arthur Miller

In The Crucible, Arthur Miller establishes the universal theme that good does not always prevail over evil. It shows that fear and suspicion can produce a mass hysteria that destroys public order and rationality. This theme is clearly identified through the character's actions throughout the play. Three characters in the play demonstrate different types of human condition through the decisions they make. Reverend Hale and John Proctor represent the human condition to choose rationally while Danforth advocates a more traditional side. All but Danforth have a change of heart from the given situation. The Crucible argues that even when a society is corrupt, a person with high moral character can follow their conscience to make a good decision. Reverend Hale is called to Salem to help solve the witchcraft chaos. At first he is confident in doing his job as a reverend by following the church standards. He agrees with the court?s tactics, which involves searching for confessions to aid the trial in sentencing people to death. Over the course of the play he experiences a huge transformation. As he listens to both sides of the trial, he realizes that the church and court standards may be wrong, and he begins to question these standards within himself. He stops supporting the court because he can no longer accept the false prosecutions that Danforth continues to make. His final decision in going against the church and following his heart shows the true side of his character. He goes through the rest of the play trying to save people?s lives. When someone asks why he has come back he states, ?Why, it is all simple. I come to do the devil?s work? (986). This shows he feels that doing what may seem wrong to others is actually the right thing to do. His efforts are in vain, however, because in the end the Puritan Court overrules all other opinion. Danforth is the judge of the witch trials and is very stubborn in his ways. His handling of the trials is overbearing and intolerant. He is shocked when Francis Nurse dares to judge his authority and states, ?Peace, Judge Hawthorne, do you know who I am, Mr. Nurse (959). He thinks that he is superior to everyone else and he believes he has the best judgment of all. Because of his job he is feeling pressured to please the majority of the people.

Thursday, January 16, 2020

How Do Evolutionary Psychologist Explain Male-Female in Courtship and Sexuality?

1. How do evolutionary psychologist explain male-female in courtship and sexuality? Evolutionary psychologist explains the male and female behaviors to sex. They explain what a male wants most from a female and what a female is looking for. For instance, like what a male will do to get what he wants out of a female even if it has to get violent. Along with female, females will take time to look for a male to have sexual intercourse with, Evolutionary psychologist studies appears that males are more disposed in many sexual relationship then females.In other words, it means the males generally want sex more often. They tend to look for the youth and beauty in a women because youthful women are more fertility. Males are also more violent and more pushy then females which in some cases leads to rape. They are more sexually jealous and controlling then females because if his mate was having sexual intercourse with another male, he will never be sure if her child will be 100% genetically h is.In the other hands, women are more committed to being in a relationship. They are less sexually active than men. Women tend to focus on his financial resource when searching for a mate. They will also look into his status. The male has to have the ability to provide the support and resources needed for there off springs later in life and also for her. Women are more cautious when it comes to courtship and sexual relationship because they are more dedicated in parenting then the males.

Wednesday, January 8, 2020

The Success Of Super Bowl Commercials By George Orwell

Thousands of Americans gathered to watch the 1984 Super Bowl, a tradition that had become a trademark in our societal culture. However, what those viewing did not know was that they would soon witness a revolutionary advertisement that would impact pop culture around the country every year following that moment. Apple would discover the success of Super Bowl commercials by referencing to one of the most beloved yet feared works of recent American history: â€Å"1984†. By alluding to the novel â€Å"1984† by George Orwell, the Apple Company was able to market their product successfully by showing representations of what the audience’s life would be like without the product, what their product represents, and how their product will impact the well-being of the viewers. As the commercial commences, viewers are introduced to a line of marchers making their way down a tube-like hallway with small screens connected to the walls that watch their every step (Mac). The ma rchers all wear the same grey, oversized work clothing and a glimpse of their faces reveals that they are completely bald and hold the same emotionless facial expressions. (Mac). On the screens it is seen that there is a man speaking to them in a dictator-like fashion whose speech is heard throughout the entirety of the advertisement as he begins to speak of â€Å"Information Purification Directives† and a â€Å"garden of pure ideology† (Mac). The marchers, which represent what would become of society, blindly follow the words of the